After war the political economy of exporting democracy pdf

Which raises another question: If we intervene to protect our own interests, what should we leave behind? Should we intervene and simply attempt to remain neutral between democracy and dictatorship? If the United States or an international coalition chooses to intervene in a state for security reasons, what obligations do we incur regarding the successor government left behind? It strikes me that there is another alternative to military intervention, either with a light or a heavy footprint, and the policy of nonintervention and free trade.

Indeed, there is a menu of tools for American democracy promotion and democracy assistance abroad that is actually quite wide. These tools include advice and training for political activists and political leaders; networking among human rights activists and political entrepreneurs; technical training for governments and government parties; financial and other forms of support for civic groups that are working to inculcate liberal values in their local environment.

These mechanisms for democracy promotion can work over time to develop the art of association, which Coyne, citing Tocqueville, considers central to the establishment and preservation of democracy. Most of the societies we are talking about have not had historical experiences of liberal democracy on which to draw, but they are undergoing rapid social change. That is why many of them are unstable and conflict ridden.

So this type of assistance can help strengthen trends that already exist within these societies, trends toward liberalism. There have been many good arguments made over the years to suggest that even when we say we are intervening on the basis of liberal values, we are in fact working to protect our own economic or security interests. But there is absolutely no question that from the very beginning of the 20th century, when America began to emerge as a global power, whenever our government has been on the cusp of major overseas engagements, democracy promotion has been a prominent part of the rationale presented by American politicians and embraced by the American people for the necessity of the overseas commitment.

Wittes argues that my proposed policy of nonintervention and free trade does not work in the case of failed states. This is incorrect. An individual in the United States trades with an individual in China, just like I trade with my local grocer. So trading with individuals living in failed states is not a problem. We want to trade with individuals in Afghanistan. Again, this is not a panacea. Wittes proposes additional training and funding for political leaders to further the cause of liberal democracy abroad.

But there is a dark side to such funding. Many of the same associations that we consider beneficial in the United States — churches, schools, political groups — often fund terrorist activity in foreign countries. So many of the associations that we throw money at are not necessarily good in terms of promoting liberal democracy abroad. But again, I think the critical point here is pointing out the costs of U.

Many people have emphasized that war is the health of the state. One of the significant costs, of course, is that we get bogged down abroad, but also there is massive growth in the size of government at home.

This is what Robert Higgs calls the ratchet effect. When there is a crisis — like a war — the size of the U. Oftentimes in these interventions the worst case scenario policymakers consider is that we will fail and come home. But there are other things that can happen. We might not just fail. We might make things worse. Bercovitch, Jacob, et al. June 19, Goldblat, Jozef June 19, Bowman, John R. December 8, Hashmi, Taj December 21, Thomas, K. V January 8, Add to list close. Remember me.

Forgotten your password? Need help? Contact SAGE. With institutional access I can: View or download all content my institution has access to. To enhance your experience on our site, SAGE stores cookies on your computer. By continuing to use this site you consent to receive cookies.

Coyne: After war: the political economy of exporting democracy. Public Choice , — Download citation. Accepted : 18 March Published : 28 March Issue Date : September Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:. Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative. Skip to main content. Search SpringerLink Search. References Bowden, M. Google Scholar Hardin, R.